Fran Townsend

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-18 23:27:25

#1534665

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-23 17:00:17

This is a pic for the Perez Hilton clic here. The connoisseurs of feet, the true believers, would give this pic a cursory 1-2 second glance

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2016-03-21 00:30:43

>"The connoisseurs of feet, the true believers"

Connoisseurs of feet are called 'foot fetishists' and have a mental disorder,
*even* according to the latest version of DSM-5:
Fetishistic Disorder DSM-5 302.81 (F65.0)

Specifiers for the diagnosis of Fetishistic Disorder include the type of stimulus which is the focus of attention. Body Part(s) (non-genital or erogenous areas of the body - e.g.,***feet*** or hair). This is also referred to as Partialism- ******preoccupation with a part of the body rather than the whole person.*****

You said you "have no diagnoses." NOW you do.

As for 'True Believers' I suspect you're about to become one very soon.
#SharkFishingWith5#TestLineAgain
"You're gonna need a bigger boat."
Then you're gonna need that barf bucket you carry to *bail water.*

User rated ★★★(ok feet)

footsiefoot reborn
Member since 03/2015
♛72

2015-09-21 04:08:57

TheRealLoverBoy1
Member since 10/2012
♛55

2014-12-02 14:48:06

Sorry sir, I guess too many of us got carried away here lol! ;)

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-02 14:52:49

Still beats having to look at Oprah.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-06 20:55:41

Hateness, why?

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-06 20:56:40

Duhh! All shoes, and in LQ/MQ.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-06 20:58:31

People keep using this word ...."shoes". WTF are they?!?!

Therapist of Feet
Member since 09/2014

2014-12-06 20:58:50

yes what are shoes?

Kranz
Member since 05/2013
♛18

2014-12-06 20:58:56

Yeah. Looks like a shoe catalogue.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-06 21:00:09

Seriously, there are 9-10 pretty good pics. No HR granted, but sufficient to enjoy the view. She has seriously elegant and sexy feet.

AverageJoe
Member since 01/2011
♛4

2014-12-06 21:36:43

No kidding. This gallery is awful. This is NOT wikiSHOES people. Trouble is it got out of hand, I know I don't feel like reporting every one of them!

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-06 21:44:18

Well, first of all *many* of them are 'legal' arch pics. But it'd be nice if there were something else, like some full-body shots showing feet. It'd also be nice to be rich enough to buy the same shoe styles including Louboutins in several different colors, just because.

User rated ★(ugly feet)

AverageJoe
Member since 01/2011
♛4

2014-12-06 21:50:35

I despise this damn new standard on shoes simply because it shows a square centimeter of foot! An arch, a heel, a big toenail, toe cleavage, it is all nonsense and why some of the more popular celebrities galleries are flooded with 5000 pictures. Makes it a pain in the ass to look through.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-06 21:54:04

Louboutins?!?! I'm guessing that's terminology for when you go to a very dirty and unkempt toilet?!?!

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-06 21:59:24

AvJoe, with u 100%. And some of the more ridiculous and mundane Chattage here has involved the "NFS" brigade here. People going ballistic because a pic showing one centimetre of arch or peep toe gets kebabed. Eg K Stewart recently. We have some seriously sick puppies here.

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-06 22:06:02

There is no 'new standard' on shoes. Arch pics have *always* been legal ever since I've been here in 2010. What's new is that we have finally been given a way to protect them from people like you who hate them enough to falsely report them just because they don't like them. As I've said SO many times, it's a collaborative wiki site, NOT any one user's or group of users' personal gallery of "Only what I/we like."
It's a big pain in the ass for *me* to look through 5000 candids to find a decent red carpet or professional studio shot I like, but I do it, and leave all that 'crap' for others because *that* is how it works here, and one man's trash is another man's treasure.

Please quit raging at the wall about it. If you don't like it, maybe write the site owner who *wrote* and *enforces* the rule about toes, soles or arches showing and tell him to change it. Before you do, you might consider looking at the Guild Poll of 2014-10-28 on that very subject, and you will see that 50 users with 483k Guild Experience want the site and rules *just* the way it is currently, versus a 'sandals only' or 'barefoot only' site, and almost NO ONE wants the latter (barefoot only).

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-06 22:08:09

Screw you, sir. I posted that poll JUST FOR YOU and maybe you should go take a look at the results. You and AverageJoe are in a *very* small minority here on the subject. Suggest you go find a site you like better or start your own. Then you can have exactly what you want. Why don't you head on over to Wikipedia and start deleting all the articles you don't agree with?

User rated ★(ugly feet)

AverageJoe
Member since 01/2011
♛4

2014-12-06 22:11:28

Excuse me for having an opinion. Protect from "people like me"? WTF?! I don't go around reporting them, so back off with your troll attack on me. I am not the only one who disagrees with you and your damn arch fetish. No need to be a jerk.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-07 05:15:13

I'm getting the popcorn ready gamoto!!!!

User rated ★(ugly feet)

AverageJoe
Member since 01/2011
♛4

2014-12-07 05:27:15

Well, since it was brought up again...
My point was if the rules allowed entire foot exposure regardless of what kind of shoe, or the lack of, the galleries would not be overrun with pictures. Some of them are ridiculous! You can still see your beloved arches, heels, or whatever.

TheRealLoverBoy1
Member since 10/2012
♛55

2014-12-07 05:39:47

And I'll repeat I am responsible for this gallery (with legit pictures) turning out this way (one dimensional) so I will refrain from uploading until I find a full body super HQ upgrade for #1167385 etc thanks.

BackInBlack60
Member since 09/2010
♛64

2014-12-07 05:43:09

>"I am responsible for this gallery (with legit pictures) turning out this way"

Copy 'n' Paste from zappos.com???

TheRealLoverBoy1
Member since 10/2012
♛55

2014-12-07 05:51:00

Nearly, in retrospect it's *as if* I've been doing exactly just that #liveandlearn.

User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)

Grik
Member since 05/2012
♛37

2014-12-07 06:12:04

Hateness...........you started this.......finish it gamoto!

User rated ★(ugly feet)

Mr Hate
Member since 05/2010
♛62

2014-12-07 06:16:14

Let's end the madness now. Sorry I ever said a damn thing about this gallery.