Lucy Griffiths (II)
Feet rating stats (410 total votes)
214
beautiful
beautiful
117
nice
nice
61
ok
ok
12
bad
bad
6
ugly
ugly
Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
You Rated: | (click to rate) |
Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts |
Gallery Settings
more info7 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Lucy Griffiths's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the guild more info
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-12-24 05:58:45 She's stingy with those feet. Naughty girl...
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-08-10 14:22:33 nice
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-07-11 15:24:34 wonderful <3
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-01-31 07:22:51 This whole series is a waste of space. don't let the resolution fool you, it's even worse than the 400 x 226 should be. Why don't we just take the shot from 200 yards, include the entire countryside around her, and call it 400 x 226? She's a postage stamp on a billboard.
|
2016-01-31 07:25:23 My standards are lower than some others' here. I usually click the picture in 'slide show' view, which sizes pics up or down to fit that window. If it looks OK in that sized-up view, I consider it "OK." This one, blown up, looks like a green blob of crap.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2015-02-17 00:34:13 Adorable feet. Can't believe she's only got "nice" rating.
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2016-01-14 17:07:05 a lot of folks rate the quality of the pics, not the feet. And these pics are not great. no good resolution sole shots, for example. From what i've seen, the feet are gorgeous.
|
2015-02-05 12:38:08 Glitterific
|