Saxon Sharbino
Feet rating stats (364 total votes)
244
beautiful
beautiful
49
nice
nice
48
ok
ok
14
bad
bad
9
ugly
ugly
| Rating: | (beautiful feet) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info46 pictures were removed from this gallery.
People who liked Saxon Sharbino's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The revised comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
Vulgar, hateful or sexually explicit comments have no place on this site. In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by the guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-08-11 18:27:01 Jaw dropping.
|
|
2020-05-18 07:33:31 Very nice view, awesome angle, great picture. Love those toes. Legs that go on and on.
|
|
2020-05-18 07:00:24 Love the girl next door thing going here
|
|
2020-01-21 17:28:34 Where's her sister is page?
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2020-01-21 17:32:32 nonexistent
|
|
User rated ★★(bad feet)
|
2020-01-22 19:39:40 not anymore
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-12-27 18:44:26 Beautiful girl. And interesting name. And her feet are very nice, IMO.
|
|
User rated ★(ugly feet)
|
2018-01-04 13:40:59 Gnarly. Did she paint her toenails yellow? A shame because she has a pretty face and a smoking body. she's also quite lazy with repainting her toenails.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-12-27 18:43:18 Is the color of her toenails the only reason you rated her feet ugly? The people here are so nitpicky sometimes...
I really hope that is paint on her toenails, though. |
|
2017-09-20 23:23:32 Did you hear what she did to Alex Trimboli?
If you don't know what I'm talking about watch American Vanda. So worth it. |
|
2018-04-07 03:17:41 what she do?
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2018-09-22 16:43:14 Alex trimboli is a liar
|
|
2018-06-12 18:13:47 Interesting yoga
|
|
User rated ★★★★(nice feet)
|
2018-06-13 20:19:30 Cool clip.
Thanks. |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-09-09 13:34:17 Sexy, love em!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-02-28 18:26:17 Prudes.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2017-02-28 04:11:14 she is 17 now, and 18 this year so i wish it was ok!
|
|
2015-10-10 04:46:34 It isn't fair!!!!!
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2015-10-10 04:52:44 Why was her gallery emptied?
|
|
2015-10-10 04:54:44 Underage.
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2015-10-10 05:00:40 :O thx! II might have known that. I've been here before it seems I should scroll down the comments more often.
|
|
2016-12-17 11:37:00 She is 17 y.o. until 11 July 2017
|
|
2017-01-05 10:05:22 born June 11, 1999. she's good here now that it is 2017
|
|
2016-10-13 05:59:26 Pics in this gallery are the latest from 2014. All underage.
|
|
2015-05-01 07:47:04 Born June 11, 1999, so underage. Gallery must be locked till 2017
|
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2015-07-19 21:04:08 It's a celebrity feet site, I'm pretty sure it's no nude pictures of her. So what's the problem??!!
|
|
2015-07-19 21:19:17 The problem is, the Admin/Owner has a site rule:
►Uploading pictures of celebs wherein they're younger than 17 is not allowed. Please report such pictures as "Underage". Do not unreport such pictures, or you will get banned. Further, the 'unwritten' rule is January 1 *after* their 17th birthday. There are two reasons for that, one of them being to allow time for pictures taken *after* age 17 to surface. The other is the *flood* of underage that happens anyway when these 'new girls' are unlocked each January 1. Technically, you are correct... it's not a porn or fetish site, so *legally* there is nothing wrong. It's just a matter of decorum and good taste to set an age limit, and we already have enough creepy old ephebophiliacs here perving out on teenagers who are two or three decades their junior and younger than their own daughters, which is kinda sick, don't you think? |
|
2015-07-19 21:36:20 It's weird how the owner says this isn't a sexualized site yet is picky about age limit. (btw, I'm not for this gallery being here. 1999 is too young. I like older women but the dichotomy in owners vision of his site is interesting.
|
|
2015-07-19 21:38:11 BABY- Don't get me started. Let's just say he's a 'complex personality.' Same guy who wants all the transgender galleries here with *no* flags or warnings.
|
|
2015-07-19 21:40:08 Confirmed as ua.
|
|
2015-09-13 01:10:54 The easy solution is - someone start another wiki. I upload about 10,000 images a week to this site, under the priviso that this isn't sexualised fetishism; if transgender galleries aren't allowed to even be flagged as transgender yet the difference between 17 yo and 17 and 1 month is a ban or not a ban then there's something wrong with the rules of this site and they are NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE USERS WISHES. Therefore we vote with our feet. Someone start the open wiki feet project, no rules, no moderators, no egofagging stupidity, just a normal one click wiki install like this joint is. 'If you build it they will come'
|
|
2015-08-08 08:04:19 So we cant have pics of her because she's 16 but we can have transfolk?
Makes sense. |
